Sponsorizzato
Elenco
Share your thoughts and get new friends, we have room for everyone, including you.
- Effettua l'accesso per mettere mi piace, condividere e commentare!
- https://rumble.com/v4242tb-daily-dose-big-pharma-censorship-with-dr.-peterson-pierre.html
The Publicis Groupe is one of the world’s largest communications groups, representing most major drug companies and tech firms. Publicis is a partner of and the largest corporate investor in NewsGuard, which rates websites on criteria of credibility and trustworthiness to guide viewers to the “most reliable” sources of news and information. Publicis is using NewsGuard to blacklist competitors to Big Pharma.
The list of influential connections is disturbing, but not shocking. Big Pharma is manipulating and censoring public discourse.
We MUST continue to ask questions and INSIST on getting answers.
https://rumble.com/v4242tb-daily-dose-big-pharma-censorship-with-dr.-peterson-pierre.html The Publicis Groupe is one of the world’s largest communications groups, representing most major drug companies and tech firms. Publicis is a partner of and the largest corporate investor in NewsGuard, which rates websites on criteria of credibility and trustworthiness to guide viewers to the “most reliable” sources of news and information. Publicis is using NewsGuard to blacklist competitors to Big Pharma. The list of influential connections is disturbing, but not shocking. Big Pharma is manipulating and censoring public discourse. We MUST continue to ask questions and INSIST on getting answers. -
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/08/22/mail-in-voting-civil-war-election-conspiracy-lincoln/
Traveling to Baltimore in the fall of 1864, Orville Wood had no way of knowing he would soon uncover the most elaborate election conspiracy in America’s brief history. Wood was a merchant from Clinton County in the most northeastern corner of New York. As a supporter of President Abraham Lincoln, he was tasked with visiting troops from his hometown to “look after the local ticket.”
New York legislators had only established the state’s mail-in voting system in April with the intent of ensuring the suffrage of White troops battling the Confederate Army. The results of the 1864 elections would heavily affect the outcome of the war.
Troops from New York were allowed to authorize individuals back home to cast a vote on their behalf. Along with their mail-in ballots, troops would assign their power of attorney on slips that required four signatures: the voter’s, the person authorized as a recipient, a witness to the signed affidavit and a fellow officer. These documents would be sealed in an envelope and sent home.
Ferry, Donahue, and their fellow conspirators found humor in their work. One accomplice mocked the outcry he expected from abolitionist newspapers following the corruption of the election. The men bragged about their past successes in fixing local elections backhipped back home to be counted in the final vote. This was the process that Orville Wood intended to uphold,he would testify in court later. He quickly found out what a challenge that would be.
Together, the men had shipped crates of fraudulent votes back to New York. But their scheme was over. Wood reported the operation to authorities. Ferry’s office was searched, and on the morning of Oct. 27, 1864 — less than two weeks before the election — he and Donahue stood trial before a military commission.
Ferry offered a full confession that same day, even offering up the names of others involved in the scheme. Donahue proved more of a challenge.
Arrests in New York and Washington continued to mount as Donahue returned to trial. Following Wood’s damning testimony and supporting evidence, Donahue begged for mercy from the court. He was a young man, newly married, with no previous record. He visibly wilted as he realized the weight of his current situation, no longer expressing the defiance with which he had entered the proceedings.
The judge advocate addressed the tribunal, saying that Donahue had engaged in one of the most gigantic frauds ever attempted in America — “a fraud which, if it shall be successful, will, in my opinion, have produced a disruption of our entire country, and our war for the preservation of the Union will be practically at an end and futile.”
In the months following Lincoln’s victory — he won 221 electoral votes to McClellan’s 21 — anti-abolitionist newspapers attacked his legitimacy, calling the trial another aspect of a conspiracy conducted by the president to ensure his reelection.
The commission that oversaw Ferry and Donahue’s trial recommended life in prison for the two men who sought to corrupt the election by mail. The president, who would soon be slain, approved.https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/08/22/mail-in-voting-civil-war-election-conspiracy-lincoln/ Traveling to Baltimore in the fall of 1864, Orville Wood had no way of knowing he would soon uncover the most elaborate election conspiracy in America’s brief history. Wood was a merchant from Clinton County in the most northeastern corner of New York. As a supporter of President Abraham Lincoln, he was tasked with visiting troops from his hometown to “look after the local ticket.” New York legislators had only established the state’s mail-in voting system in April with the intent of ensuring the suffrage of White troops battling the Confederate Army. The results of the 1864 elections would heavily affect the outcome of the war. Troops from New York were allowed to authorize individuals back home to cast a vote on their behalf. Along with their mail-in ballots, troops would assign their power of attorney on slips that required four signatures: the voter’s, the person authorized as a recipient, a witness to the signed affidavit and a fellow officer. These documents would be sealed in an envelope and sent home. Ferry, Donahue, and their fellow conspirators found humor in their work. One accomplice mocked the outcry he expected from abolitionist newspapers following the corruption of the election. The men bragged about their past successes in fixing local elections backhipped back home to be counted in the final vote. This was the process that Orville Wood intended to uphold,he would testify in court later. He quickly found out what a challenge that would be. Together, the men had shipped crates of fraudulent votes back to New York. But their scheme was over. Wood reported the operation to authorities. Ferry’s office was searched, and on the morning of Oct. 27, 1864 — less than two weeks before the election — he and Donahue stood trial before a military commission. Ferry offered a full confession that same day, even offering up the names of others involved in the scheme. Donahue proved more of a challenge. Arrests in New York and Washington continued to mount as Donahue returned to trial. Following Wood’s damning testimony and supporting evidence, Donahue begged for mercy from the court. He was a young man, newly married, with no previous record. He visibly wilted as he realized the weight of his current situation, no longer expressing the defiance with which he had entered the proceedings. The judge advocate addressed the tribunal, saying that Donahue had engaged in one of the most gigantic frauds ever attempted in America — “a fraud which, if it shall be successful, will, in my opinion, have produced a disruption of our entire country, and our war for the preservation of the Union will be practically at an end and futile.” In the months following Lincoln’s victory — he won 221 electoral votes to McClellan’s 21 — anti-abolitionist newspapers attacked his legitimacy, calling the trial another aspect of a conspiracy conducted by the president to ensure his reelection. The commission that oversaw Ferry and Donahue’s trial recommended life in prison for the two men who sought to corrupt the election by mail. The president, who would soon be slain, approved.WWW.WASHINGTONPOST.COMMail-in ballots were part of a plot to deny Lincoln reelection in 1864Then, in 1864, the most elaborate election conspiracy in America’s brief history was discovered before it could corrupt the vote. -
- Not sure of other states, but Oklahoma requires a valid ID to voteNot sure of other states, but Oklahoma requires a valid ID to vote
-
- https://www.ntd.com/supreme-court-filing-jack-smiths-appointment-is-unconstitutional_962163.html
Former Attorney General Edwin Meese and two scholars submitted an amicus brief with the Supreme Court that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional and that every action against former President Donald Trump should be declared null and void.
“This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” according to Wednesday’s filing from Mr. Meese and two constitutional scholars. “Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution. Those actions can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices.”
The filing Wednesday argued that Attorney General Merrick Garland also “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority” when Mr. Smith was appointed last year to oversee two federal cases targeting President Trump. The attorney general has cited a statute for the appointment, but the statute is not even “remotely authorized the appointment by the Attorney General of a private citizen to receive extraordinary criminal law enforcement power under the title of Special Counsel,” the filing said.
The brief argued that both statutes and the Constitution do not allow the attorney general to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute U.S. attorney under the title ‘special counsel.'” The brief added: “That is what happened on November 18, 2022.” The DOJ has not filed a response yet to their claims with the Supreme Court.
“We do not want future U.S. Attorney Generals … to be able to pick any tough thug lawyer off the street and empower him in the way Attorney General Merrick Garland has empowered private citizen Jack Smith,” Mr. Calabresi argued. “Think of what that would have led to during the McCarthy era or in the Grant, Harding, Truman, or Nixon Administrations in all of which an Attorney General was corrupt.”https://www.ntd.com/supreme-court-filing-jack-smiths-appointment-is-unconstitutional_962163.html Former Attorney General Edwin Meese and two scholars submitted an amicus brief with the Supreme Court that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional and that every action against former President Donald Trump should be declared null and void. “This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” according to Wednesday’s filing from Mr. Meese and two constitutional scholars. “Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution. Those actions can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices.” The filing Wednesday argued that Attorney General Merrick Garland also “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority” when Mr. Smith was appointed last year to oversee two federal cases targeting President Trump. The attorney general has cited a statute for the appointment, but the statute is not even “remotely authorized the appointment by the Attorney General of a private citizen to receive extraordinary criminal law enforcement power under the title of Special Counsel,” the filing said. The brief argued that both statutes and the Constitution do not allow the attorney general to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute U.S. attorney under the title ‘special counsel.'” The brief added: “That is what happened on November 18, 2022.” The DOJ has not filed a response yet to their claims with the Supreme Court. “We do not want future U.S. Attorney Generals … to be able to pick any tough thug lawyer off the street and empower him in the way Attorney General Merrick Garland has empowered private citizen Jack Smith,” Mr. Calabresi argued. “Think of what that would have led to during the McCarthy era or in the Grant, Harding, Truman, or Nixon Administrations in all of which an Attorney General was corrupt.”WWW.NTD.COMSupreme Court Filing: Jack Smith’s Appointment Is UnconstitutionalFormer Attorney General Edwin Meese and two scholars submitted an amicus brief with the Supreme Court that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) appointment of special counsel Jack Smith was unconstitutional and that every action against former President Donald Trump should be declared null and void. “This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before […] - Medical Tyranny: What’s the mRNA-DNA Intention?
YOU NEED TO ASK YOURSELF, ‘WHY?’!
SUMMARY: Examining the Medical Tyranny being perpetrated on Americans (really the entire world) with the full cooperation of a lying government and a lying Big Pharma… Science showing: mRNA alters DNA, mRNA by wafer intake, aerosol mRNA dispersal by air & Dr. Malone attacked for INCONVENIENT TRUTHS. –TAKE A LOOK: https://bit.ly/3RVh4II
#ResistMedicalTyrany #mRNAlies
Medical Tyranny: What’s the mRNA-DNA Intention? YOU NEED TO ASK YOURSELF, ‘WHY?’! SUMMARY: Examining the Medical Tyranny being perpetrated on Americans (really the entire world) with the full cooperation of a lying government and a lying Big Pharma… Science showing: mRNA alters DNA, mRNA by wafer intake, aerosol mRNA dispersal by air & Dr. Malone attacked for INCONVENIENT TRUTHS. –TAKE A LOOK: https://bit.ly/3RVh4II #ResistMedicalTyrany #mRNAliesBIT.LYMedical Tyranny: What’s the mRNA-DNA Intention?YOU NEED TO ASK YOURSELF, 'WHY?' ! John R. Houk, Blog Editor December 24, 2022 WELL… It appears holiday distractions has caught up... -
Sponsorizzato
Sponsorizzato